Two tiers. One honesty system.

Do lower tiers see less-honest numbers?

No. The verification envelope — badges, confidence caps, provenance — is identical on every tier, including Explorer. Tiers change how much of the platform you can use, never how truthful it is.

What's actually validated today?

The accuracy page lists it precisely: the industrial nowcast, COT positioning in WTI crude (OOS AUC 0.614, point-in-time re-validated), bank stress, NSS repricing, and more — alongside models still in-sample, real-but-unvalidated data, labeled scaffolds, and the claims we've retired (the recession probit's 0.862 AUC, retired 2026-07-20 after a leakage audit, and the earlier 10-market COT table, retired 2026-07-23 when a point-in-time re-run across 22 markets passed only 5; the served numbers carry their honest badges).

Is this a Bloomberg replacement?

No. Latavis does not replace a market-data terminal, execution, or messaging, and we no longer frame our pricing against one. What you are paying for is a validation-graded prediction layer, cited AI, and a published accuracy ledger with a retirement log — Explorer is $5,988/yr and Professional $29,988/yr, and the honesty system is identical on both.

Can we trial it?

The live scorecard and coverage pages are public — you can audit us before you pay. For a working trial of the terminal, talk to sales and we'll set up a scoped workspace.